fire+book+whole evening to read=amazingness |
READ THIS FIRST!!!! If you haven’t read the first hunger
games book and want to, you may not want to read this post. There will be some spoilers, although not any serious plot revelations. If you
have read the second and third books in the series (Catching Fire and
Mockingjay) PLEASE BE CAREFUL in the
comments, as I have not yet read them.
So I’m waaaay behind the times, as per usual, and just read “The
Hunger Games” last weekend while I was in the mountains with my family. If you don’t live under a rock, you know that
these books are one of the most popular on the market right now. My friends’ facebook statuses didn’t let me down, it was a pageturner. If I was going to make a scale, it would be
somewhere on the level of the Sookie Stackhouse (TruBlood) novels, but not a “Harry
Potter”.
Although the books were captivating and the characters
likable, I was immediately disturbed by the level of violence in the book. The book starts dark from the very first
chapter and doesn’t let up, even at the end.
I was disturbed by the premise (24 children fighting to the death, while
the entire country watches on television), and disgusted at myself for being
unable to put the book down.
As a reader, I was disgusted with the citizens of “the
capitol” who are crazy with bloodlust, yet I refused to set the book aside as I
read pages and pages of a boy being tortured to death by a pack of wild
dogs. All this in a book that is being
read by children.
Now, I’m notoriously a wimp. During “The Immortals” I sat outside
the theater for 10 minute stretches with my hands over my ears and kept my eyes
covered for half of “The Dark Knight”, but I have to wonder if it’s a good
thing that most people are desensitized to this kind of violence. Halfway through the book, while urging
Katniss to go ahead and kill one of the tributes, I stopped and thought
good grief, these are children!
I’ve been debating whether I should read the next two. I want to, of course, but I wonder if it’s really the best thing.
I did some research and was surprised by the mild reviews. Focus on the Family, a notoriously conservative Christian
organization said:
“Despite the many alarming images, readers find little if
any gratuitous gore.”
And commonsensemedia gave it a 3/5 for violence. Really? I
wonder what book got a 5/5?
What do you guys think? Am I being too hard on “The Hunger
Games”? Too old-fashioned? I love
reading and believe in teaching children the difference between fantasy and
reality, but I also believe in protecting our minds from excessive..."bad stuff". (Philipians 4:8).
I’m not saying this to condemn anyone, really, it’s just
food for thought, and I’d love to know your opinions.
On a lighter note, I’m loving this new t-swizzle/civil wars
song for the movie soundtrack! How perfectly does it go with the theme of the
book?
Hey! It's Lauren, I ran across your blog on FB... but I think that you might be missing the point of The Hunger Games. It's not to revel in violence, it's to show the truth of what can happen in a totalitarian government, and the level to which humans can succumb if given the opportunity. As the books go on, it's clear that Suzanne Collins has taken a lot from War and Peace, Hemingway, and O'Brien, who all show the futility of war and violence. The book isn't promoting violence, it's showing why we need to overcome such inclinations. That's why she's chosen such an overtly despicable topic, killing children, so that we as the audience can be against it and take something positive from the book: the desire for peace.
ReplyDelete